Oh you knew it was going to happen. These two first person shooters were destined to be pitted against each other from the moment we first had a glimpse of them. Firstly, Titanfall is created by the outfit whose development team are made up of people from the original Infinity Ward that birthed Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. Both games are set in the future. Both games have the similar run and gun formula (from COD:MW no less). Both titles have a focus on maneuverability; Titanfall with its jet packing and wall running focus, and Advanced Warfare with boosting abilities courtesy of the Exo Suit. Both titles are fighting for the top spot of competitive shooters of 2014. The question is, which one is the better game? We discuss the issue below. Make sure to check out our reviews for Titanfall and Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

Visuals

Minus his lifeless eyes, Kevin Spacey's digital self is impressive

Minus his lifeless eyes, Kevin Spacey’s digital self is impressive

Both games are cross-platform and appear on last gen consoles as well as the current ones but one is significantly more superior than the other in terms of visuals and that game is Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. From some excellent facial modelling (Kevin Spacey baby!) and some genuinely awe inspiring scenes, albeit scripted ones, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare beats Titanfall hands down.

Titanfall was built upon the ageing Source engine and unfortunately, whilst we like the visual style of the game, it simply appears outdated on current gen consoles.

The Titans are a joy to control

Titanfall’s visuals aren’t what we would describe as ‘next-gen’

However, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare suffers from inconsistent visual quality and some of the maps on the multiplayer side of things are hardly a cut above the visual quality we had last gen. Call of Duty wins out over Titanfall courtesy of the latter game being built upon ageing tech.

Winner: Call of Duty Advanced Warfare

Campaign

Don’t be fooled by the inclusion of a campaign mode in Titanfall. This is simply multiplayer dressed up with a loose narrative told by way of events that occur during a match. One of the biggest criticisms against Titanfall was its lack of a proper fleshed out story mode and we agree with that. There was certainly a lot potential here but Respawn squandered that in favour of focusing on the multiplayer.

COD: AW's campaign wins over Titanfall by default

COD: AW’s campaign wins over Titanfall by default

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare’s campaign has a template very similar to its predecessors to the point that its getting rather old. The story was uninspiring and general narrative was nothing original. However, what the campaign did do was let players experience some brilliant visual set pieces with a discernible narrative and that’s a lot more than Titanfall ever did. Some of the on-rails sections were very also interesting albeit limited of course by their design.

Winner: Call of Duty Advanced Warfare

Multiplayer/ Gameplay is king.

For many players, multiplayer is the key component in recent Call of Duty games. It is also the sole focus in Titanfall. Remember folks, gameplay is king and this the main decider on which title reigns supreme over the other. Both games have very similar gameplay mechanics as well as pacing and both have their own pros and cons. Let’s take a look at the different elements of the gameplay/multiplayer:

Multiplayer Modes

One of Titanfall’s biggest problems at launch was its the lack of gameplay modes. To date, some more have been added but really, the main game modes are the one’s that are worth playing. COD: AW on the other hand, benefits from several MP modes, including the survival mode that can be played cooperatively. With the addition of split screen play offline as well as online, COD: AW really ticks all the right boxes and more when it comes to offering a more fully fleshed out package and therefore, it wins, yet again.

Winner: Call of Duty Advanced Warfare

Player movement

Advanced Warfare differs from its predecessors mainly due to the inclusion of the Exo suit which changes the pace of the gameplay dramatically. Now you can boost up in the air, strafe left and right with the boost feature or even slam into enemies as you propel yourself into the ground. This added freedom makes a big difference to the overall flow of the game and as a result of this, many of the maps have had to be designed to cater for this added moblity afforded to players. When the gameplay footage for the game was first revealed, people immediately drew parallels with Titanfall, which also made player movement a key focus of its appeal.

Skilled players can navigate through entire areas of maps in Titanfall

Skilled players can navigate through entire areas of maps in Titanfall

Titanfall however, doesn’t just shoe-horn this movement into an already existing gameplay template like Sledgehammer have done with Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. No. The player movement is far more fluid, intuitive and well thought out. Whilst good players will be utilising the Exo suit’s abilities a lot more more in general in COD: AW due to the strafing ability that requires no adjacent wall/terrain, in Titanfall,  these movements and abilities introduce a whole different ‘layer’ to competitive matchmaking. These moves are easy to learn but difficult to master and highly skilled players will use the surrounding terrain to great advantage. Player speed is increased dramatically if you can maintain the momentum in wall running and once you get really good at it, you will be navigating around your enemies with such proficiency that your foes will sooner die of dizziness than from your weapon.

Furthermore, one of the biggest reasons why player movements manifest into more meaningful gameplay ramifications in Titanfall when compared to COD: AW is the map design that complements these abilities which leads us nicely into the next area of comparison.

Winner: Titanfall

Map Design

Oh how we miss the quality of Infinity Ward's maps

Oh how we miss the quality of Infinity Ward’s maps

Ever since Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 it appears that the general map design in the COD games have severely dropped in quality and design. Whereas before we could reel out map names like Afghan, Terminal, Crash, Crossfire, Karachi, Rundown and even Wasteland, now, across the franchise, we struggle to think of a single memorable map in these games and Advanced Warfare is no exception.

Titanfall’s maps are more purpose built

The Greenband map is  simply atrocious.

The Greenband map is simply atrocious.

One of our biggest gripes with COD: AW’s maps are just how uninspiring the vast majority of them are especially when taking into account the added Exosuit ability. Surely then, you would would think that these maps would strongly be built around the player movement which is the main differentiator between this latest game and its predecessors but no, instead, we find ourselves either plonked on the rooftops of a few buildings or unexpectedly met with the message “you are out of bounds”. The map designers have taken a blunt force approach with the maps and just applied some more vertical sections to accommodate the new changes and  that leaves us disappointed. You can expect the same old approach with the maps, with multiple routes to most areas of engagement and several ‘camp-friendly’ spots for players to exploit.

Ziplines, open areas for Titans, smaller areas for pilots- Titanfall's maps have the variety COD:AW's don't

Ziplines, open areas for Titans, smaller areas for pilots- Titanfall’s maps have the variety COD:AW’s don’t

Titanfall’s maps are more purpose built and not only have good variety, but also benefit from some great design. We have rarely come across campers in Titanfall. The maps are designed in such a way that players are encouraged to traverse the multiple areas and engage enemies as opposed to finding a nest to snuggle in and exploit. The maps benefit from several platforms and walls designed for players to traverse via wall running as well as having areas to cater for the ‘verticality’ in engagements. Where COD: AW adds in a few buildings for you to climb, Titanfall’s maps appear to be sculpted at every inch for both pilots and Titans to navigate and destroy their enemies with honour.

Winner: Titanfall

Gunplay/Gameplay

The Titans really are a game change

The Titans really are a game change

Whilst both games share a similar template in the general running and gunning elements of firefights, Titanfall takes this to a whole new level with the inclusion of the Titans. The Titans are not only a more meaningful answer to COD’s killstreak reward system, they also add a whole new layer to the competitive nature of battles. Generally, in both games, because of the fast and frantic nature of the gunfights, the person who spots his enemy first or reacts first is generally the victor. The Titans are a direct answer to this problem where gameplay depth is reduced in favour of this ‘hide and seek’ mechanic. When you are in command of a Titan and are going up against another Titan, you have to consider several factors all at once for instance, are you a heavy titan than can soak up a lot more damage vs the more nimble Stryder Titan that has increased maneuverability? Then you consider what weapons you have; do you have a machine gun that deals more ‘chip damage’ compared to a weapon that deals blast damage or one that has to be powered up so you have to force yourself into more long range engagements etc? There are several factors at play here and it harkens back to the gameplay depth we saw in arena shooters like Quake 3  that have been fizzled away lately for the sake of accessibility and mass market appeal.

There are far more ways to customise your weapons in COD: AW

There are far more ways to customise your weapons in COD: AW

COD: AW benefits from having far more weapons and weapon attachments for on-foot gameplay. Titanfall suffers in this regard and the lack of a variety for weapons held by pilots serves to hurt the longevity of the game. However, COD: AW appears to rely a lot more on gimmicks in the shape of all sorts of hand-holding attachments for players or abilities whereas Titanfall demands players to understand the nature of the weapon they are wielding and forces them to change their approach to match the situation.

Titanfall also benefits from dedicated servers whereas it appears that COD: AW does not. Already, in our week long play-through, we have had SEVERAL instances of being spawn-killed, bullets not registering and annoying instances of lag. All this is par for the course really when talking about COD but these are what we consider to be last-gen problems; we were promised something more and if Titanfall, a brand new IP from a new studio can deliver a far more fluid and balanced MP affair a lot earlier on in this new console life cycle, then Activision and the studios developing these games part of a billion dollar franchise simply have no excuse whatsoever.

Winner: Titanfall

And the winner is….

One game is a result of genuine concerted effort to help move the arena shooter fps genre forward and the other is desperately trying to find a way to remain fresh by making more radical changes to a pre-existing template. For us, the winner is a clear one. Titanfall is the more deserving candidate and the overall winner. Respawn Entertainment clearly sat down and had a long hard think about what their next FPS should be like and how to move the genre forward. Titanfall cuts all the unnecessary fat (maybe a bit too finely) and discards a pretentious and hollow single player campaign, sacrifices the need for visual quality by focusing squarely on gameplay and presents us with one of the most tightly balanced shooters we have had in years. From the inclusion of Titans that add much needed gameplay depth, the player movement that are more fluid, the map design that is more complimentary to the flow of the game and tighter more competitively balanced gameplay, Titanfall is this year’s king of competitive first person shooters.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditEmail this to someone
Share this Article

Gaz

Proprietor of www.gameondaily.com and a die-hard gaming fan since I was old enough to hold a controller.

You may also like...

11 Responses

  1. Anonymous says:

    Well let me just point one thing, Titanfall isn’t really lacking in terms of visuals, and I mean that. But the engine it was made from wasn’t the same Source engine that ran Half Life 2 and its episodes. It was a new and significantly improved Source Engine introduced sometime in late 2013

    • G. Lehri says:

      It had a great art style, granted, but in terms of raw visual fidelity it is clearly lacking.

  2. T Casey says:

    I can’t agree more with this rundown. Obviously both franchises have copied off eavh other a lot, but what Titanfall offers in multiplayer is far more balanced and structured than AW. Thr mechanics, level design, and everything just makes more sense and is a lot more fun to play.

  3. Paterickz says:

    Yeah dawm right. I can only agree with u all. Nice test. Hope we’re gettin such a nice Titanfall 2 maybe in 2016 =). So long i’m happy with my Titanfall.

  4. Joshua Fan says:

    I was excited for CoD: AW when I saw the trailer, but after seeing some real gameplay footage, it had me thinking, “That’s it?”

    Titanfall has the finely tuned weapon balance of the first Halo (another game with few weapons) and the real parkour of Mirror’s Edge; I loved both those games, and this is their love child I’ve always wanted.

    • G. Lehri says:

      Precisely Joshua. It’s such a shame that Titanfall seems to have been relegated to the sidelines. The balance struck is perfect and once you play COD: AW and go back to this, you realise just how great Titanfall is.

  5. The Marb says:

    Nice article Gaz, have to be honest wasn’t expecting that much but fell in love with Titanfall.

    I should point out I havent played AW yet but have played Ghosts, but what I liked about Titanfall is its not only really brilliantly balanced with good use of verticality of its environments, its also really fair. What I mean by this is it doesn’t suffer from the average lifespan of 15 seconds syndrome that almost every Call of Duty has for ages. To get good at CoD requires a real concerted effort and players who are weaker fall behind and have a bad time.

    Titanfalls use of bots and Titans means even those who aren’t quite as skilled are still in the mix and don’t feel like they are just meat for the grinder.

    Its not a perfect game for sure but enjoyed it a helluva lot more than Ghosts, SP or nay.

  6. Truth says:

    Yup Titanfall did a LOT of things better.
    Still…AW turned out better than I expected. It’s better than Ghosts.

  7. WeDgEzz says:

    Could’nt agree more, Titanfall needs to be loved and played by everyone.
    Stop the hate!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>